In December 2025, Australia became the first country to ban social media use for kids under 16. It’s a radical step that sparked instant debate. But in the U.S., it might not be as controversial as expected.
According to new data from Angus Reid, 72% of Americans support a full ban for those under 16. That includes parents, many of whom are already trying to manage screen time at home.
A Generation Under Watch
Half of Americans (52%) say teens aren’t capable of using social media responsibly—that’s not exactly a vote of confidence—while parents of older teens are more lenient. Among those with 16- and 17-year-olds, 68% disagree with that sentiment, though even they aren’t entirely convinced.
Across the board, concern is nearly universal:
These fears are far from abstract. They reflect a struggle that many families are already navigating daily.
Parenting in the Algorithm Era
Most parents aren’t waiting for policy to step in; they’re already setting boundaries (or doing their best to). Among parents with kids aged 10 to 15, a majority report active oversight. They restrict which apps their kids can use, monitor activity, and set time limits.
Even older teens aren’t entirely off the hook, with just 29% of parents with 16- to 17-year-olds reporting having no restrictions. For many parents, controlling their children’s social media use is a daily struggle. So it’s interesting to see a clear line when we look at responsibility: 64% of Americans say regulating social media should fall to parents, while 36% think it should be the government’s job.
These findings suggest that while a ban may sound appealing, many see it as a backup plan.
Not All Platforms Are Created Equal
If a partial ban were introduced, some platforms would feel it more than others. X (formerly Twitter) tops the list, with 83% support for banning users under 16. TikTok follows at 80%, with Snapchat close behind at 78%.
YouTube is treated differently. In Australia, YouTube was included in the ban because it was the “most frequently cited platform” on which children under 16 viewed harmful content. The outlook in America is much different, with fewer than half of Americans (45%) supporting a ban for younger teens.
The distinction tells us that not all screen time is viewed the same. Some platforms are seen as more harmful or harder to regulate.
The Trade-Off
Social media isn’t all bad. It helps teens find communities and stay connected. But frequent, unregulated use comes with risks. Studies link it to anxiety, depression, and poor sleep. There’s also pressure to perform, compare, and keep up.
For Millennials and Gen Z, this hits close to home. We were the first to grow up online, but the social media tsunami of the last decade is a whole other ballgame. Now we’re the ones deciding what comes next.
When it comes to the “right” age for social media exposure, there is little consensus. Sixteen is the most popular answer, but only at 25%. Other ages are scattered across the board. Some say as young as 10 to 12, others land on 13, 14, or 15.
It’s more of a spectrum than a clear line, reflecting just how complicated the issue really is.
Where This Leaves Us
Australia’s ban raises an important question. Should access be restricted, or should habits be reshaped? Americans seem to want both. They support stronger guardrails, but still value parental control.
The real challenge is figuring out what healthy use actually looks like, and that’s something no policy can fully define. At least not yet.
Your perspective matters—and it comes with rewards. Join Angus Reid USA to earn FREE gift cards by sharing your views through quick surveys on the issues shaping American life today.
